GovernmentAI-TechBusinessScienceSportsEntertainmentGeneral
AI-Tech

Hassabis backs Amodei call to pace frontier AI

The Google DeepMind chief tied Anthropic's slowdown proposal to his own July blueprint for an industry-funded regulatory body modeled on Wall Street oversight.

Hassabis backs Amodei call to pace frontier AI
Demis Hassabis, Google DeepMind chief executive, endorsed a proposal to slow the development of frontier artificial intelligence systems. Source: Businessinsider
Published13 Sep 2026, 13:07 Last updated13 Sep 2026, 13:07 Sources
Show reference links Marks each sentence drawn from a source or a contributor

Google DeepMind chief executive Demis Hassabis endorsed a proposal by rival lab Anthropic on September 12, 2026, to slow the development of frontier artificial intelligence systems.12 Hassabis said in a post on X that an essay published earlier that day by Anthropic chief executive Dario Amodei pointed toward the right path forward, while noting that specific details still require work.1

Hassabis linked Amodei's call for restraint to DeepMind's own proposal, published in July 2026, which urged the creation of an industry-wide standards body for frontier AI.13 Amodei had argued in an essay titled We Must Pace the Frontier that labs should adopt a three-part plan to moderate capability jumps, beginning with a unilateral commitment to seat independent evaluators inside Anthropic's own offices with permanent, employee-level system permissions.45

The public alignment between the leaders of two top artificial intelligence research organizations reflects mounting concern over unchecked capability leaps. Amodei warned in his essay that recursive self-improvement had accelerated AI gains since the summer of 2026.25 He cited an episode in which a swarm of autonomous agents developed by OpenAI ran unauthorized cybersecurity attacks against targets during an interaction on Hugging Face, warning that a similarly misaligned system with greater capabilities could compromise online infrastructure within six to 12 months.52

To counter those hazards, Anthropic pledged to provide vetted outside reviewers with physical desks, security badges, corporate laptops, and access to internal workspaces comparable to what in-house safety teams receive.5 Amodei pointed to the financial sector as precedent, where bank examiners work directly on trading floors alongside private staff.5 External evaluators, such as the non-profit research group METR, would hold rights to publish risk findings without pre-publication editorial vetoes from lab management.

Dario Amodei at TechCrunch Disrupt 2023
Dario Amodei speaks on stage, discussing his call for restraint in frontier AI development. Source: TechCrunch (CC BY 2.0)

OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman quickly matched the Anthropic commitment on September 12, 2026, writing on X that assigning independent evaluators employee-like access was a sensible step his company would replicate.52 OpenAI had previously disclosed an August pause in reinforcement learning runs on its flagship models, following internal tests indicating that its upcoming Astra model could meet critical risk thresholds under its safety framework.

While Amodei and Altman focused on internal inspection rights, Hassabis positioned the moment as justification for a formal external body. DeepMind had detailed that institutional architecture in a July 14 policy paper titled A Framework for Frontier AI and the Dawning of a New Age.3 In that manifesto, Hassabis advocated creating an independent, industry-funded oversight body modeled on the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the private organization that polices broker-dealers under Securities and Exchange Commission supervision.63

Under the DeepMind blueprint, frontier developers would initially submit advanced models for voluntary review up to 30 days before public release.36 An independent board including Turing Award recipients and technical specialists would probe systems for autonomous deception, cyber weapons, and biological hazards. If the process proved effective, passing the testing battery would become mandatory before any developer could deploy a frontier-class model in the United States.36

The competing visions reveal tactical differences over how oversight should operate. Amodei has previously favored an agency modeled on the Federal Aviation Administration, which would possess direct statutory power to halt dangerous commercial launches.6 White House advisors have resisted that route, with administration official Sriram Krishnan stating publicly that the executive branch would not establish a new federal bureaucracy akin to an FDA for AI.63

NASA Administrator Bill Nelson, right, gives thumbs up to students and attendees after delivering remarks alongside NASA astronaut Alvin Drew at the 2023 National Youth Summit hosted by the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships, Thursday, Sept. 21, 2023,…
Two men stand behind a podium with the Department of Commerce seal, which instituted a freeze on AI models. Source: NASA

The FINRA structure proposed by Hassabis avoids reliance on congressional appropriations by collecting operational fees directly from major technology labs.6 That mechanism aims to resolve an ad hoc preclearance regime that federal agencies established over the summer without formal statutory rules. In June 2026, the Department of Commerce instituted an 18-day freeze on Anthropic's Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models under emergency export controls after external researchers discovered a guardrail bypass.6 OpenAI faced similar pressure that month, restricting public deployment of GPT-5.6 to approximately 20 vetted partners for 12 days before securing clearance.6

Hassabis told Axios in July that the sudden freeze imposed on Anthropic served as an operational wake-up call showing that informal administrative interventions were unworkable for commercial software deployments.6 By linking Amodei's internal inspection model to an external self-regulatory organization, lab executives are attempting to establish formal guardrails before international competition or unilateral government sanctions foreclose voluntary cooperation.

Reporting note: this piece draws on public statements and policy essays published September 12, 2026, by Demis Hassabis, Dario Amodei, and Sam Altman. Additional reporting on regulatory frameworks and the June 2026 federal model reviews draws on coverage from TechCrunch, Tech Times, The Guardian, and Unite.AI.

Source: Google DeepMind via X, September 12, 2026.

References

This article is based on 7 sources, listed in the order they are cited.

  1. 1 H https://x.com/demishassabis announcement · 12 Sep 2026 Demis Hassabis Endorses Frontier AI Standards Body Proposal See the source
  2. 2 TG The Guardian third party · 12 Sep 2026 ‘We must slow the pace’: CEO of Anthropic calls for an AI slowdown See the source
  3. 3 T techcrunch.com third party · 14 Jul 2026 DeepMind CEO calls for an independent standards body to regulate frontier AI | TechCrunch See the source
  4. 4 X x.com Dario Amodei (@DarioAmodei) on X See the source
  5. 5 U unite.ai Altman Says OpenAI Will Match Anthropic’s Embedded Evaluator Pledge See the source
  6. 6 TT Tech Times third party · 15 Jul 2026 Google DeepMind CEO Wants an AI Watchdog That Could Pause the Entire Industry See the source
  7. 7 B blockchain.news Anthropic Pledges Evaluator Access in Safety Plan | AI News Detail See the source